A scientific paper bravely published by
a
leading radiation biologist, Prof. Dariusz
Leszczynski now allows top neurologists,
like
Keith Black, MD of Los Angeles'
Cedars-Sinai
Hospital to issue warnings to their
patients
about the dangers of cellphone use,
which
he describes as "Cooking the
brain". The cell
phone industry retaliated against
Leszczynski
by lobbying to have his funding stopped
and
in the meantime, insurance companies
have
also stopped coverage for health
damages
related to cell phone use.
In 2011, San Francisco, CA passed a law,
which originally required retailers
of cell
phones to display the amount of
radiation
that was emitted by each unit.
Lobbyists
successfully had the law revised
to simply
inform people on ways to
diminish their
exposure to cell phone
radiation.
Ellie Marks' husband had a golfball-sized
tumor in his brain, next to where he
regularly
used his cellphone. It was removed
and he
subsequently suffered severe memory
loss.
She says that over 20
cities and states tried
to pass similar legislation to
that of San Francisco
- and all were threatened
with lawsuits from
the cell phone industry.
Brent Bocook, a former US Olympic Champion
Crew Team Member had a portion of his
brain
removed, right next to where he used
to always
place his cellphone. That
particular portion of
the brain is responsible for
motor control and his
surgery has left him almost
completely disabled,
physically.
He says he is spearheading a class
action lawsuit
against the industry because he
believes that this
is the only way that big business can
be made to
take responsibility for itself, as
was the case with
the tobacco industry.
He notes that cell phone use is much more
He notes that cell phone use is much more
dangerous for children because their
skulls are
a lot thinner. Brain tumors
associated with cell
phone use has replaced leukemia as
the
number one child-killer.
Truthseeker host, Daniel Bushell uses a radiation
detector to measure the amount of
radiation
emanating from commonly-used household
items:
*Microwave oven: 800 microvolts
*WiFi Router: 800 microvolts
*Tablet PC: 2,000 microvolts (watching a movie).
*Smartphone: 40,000 microvolts (Samsung S3).
This is over a thousand times the
normal
background radiation levels of 30
microvolts.
The use of cellphones and other wireless
technologies is being called the next
'casualty
catastrophe,' after tobacco and asbestos.
iPhones
now all contain a legal disclaimer page
with fine
print, which cannot be enlarged and which
is
relatively difficult to locate within
the phone's
navigation. It discloses the dangers
of radiation
exposure from cellphones and advises
users to
keep the device at least 10mm from
the body.
At the same time, a wireless lobbying group
called the CTIA assures us that
"Radio waves
from cellphones are safe" and studies
paid for
by the cellphone industry claim that,
"Cellphone
use causes no biological
damage." However,
independent studies consistently
report serious
health effects, ranging from DNA
damage, a
300% reduction in sperm counts, 290%
more
brain tumors, autism and birth
defects.
Former Senior White House Advisor,
Epidemiologist, Dr. Devra Davis
testified to
the Senate and gives a
hair-raising report here
about the back-stories behind these
contradictory
scientific reports: The independent
scientists who
reported on the ill effects of cell
phones found
themselves under attack by the
cellphone
industry, who would attempt to
get them fired
and to get their funding taken
away or else
accuse them of fraud.
When that didn't work, they hired
inexperienced scientists who didn't
know
anything about the subject to *look*
like they
were replicating the incriminating
experiments
and when all of the above didn't
work, they
wrote an internal memo, in which
they stated,
"We war-gamed the science."
Journalist, Anthony Gucciardi
proved how easy
it is for industry to plant
fake science in respectable
science publications, in the very
similar case
involving the drug Prozac, which
was proven in the
1980s to increase the incidence of
suicide among
users and to cause violent behavior - but
this was
hidden from the public until 2005, until
there was
a BBC expose. In response, the
manufacturers
hired their own scientists to prove how
"great"
Prozac was.
Producers of anti-depressants have since been
mandated to disclose these drugs' side
effects,
which one may read in their accompanying
manuals
or overhear, in the blindingly-fast
and unintelligible
disclosure statements that run during
television
advertisements for these products.
Remember,
virtually all the mass-murdering shooters
in these
recent attacks were taking this drug or
else one
of many similar fluoride-based, Selective
Serotonin
Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI), at the time
that they
massacred people by the dozens. Gucciardi
says
he believes that once the public becomes
aware of
these dangerous side effects, the public
outcry will
be worse than it was for cigarettes.
Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since
1981 says, "The system is broken,
nobody has
been told the truth. It's
crazy."
The science which
would eventually prove that
cigarettes and
secondhand smoke damaged human
health during the did not yet
exist when tobacco
was initially marketed - but
cellphones were launched
after preliminary science was already available
as
to its inherent dangers and
these products were
released into the public without
any safety studies,
whatsoever.
Dr. Slesin says, "The point is to
take action." Action
is already being taken outside the US: In
Italy, a
landmark supreme court ruling found a
"causal link"
between cell phone use and brain tumors.
In France,
WiFi is being taken down in schools and
replaced with
cabled Internet in and countries from
Germany to
Israel and Finland are moving to stop cell
phone
sales to kids. In the UK, children under
the age of 18,
have long been barred from cell phone use.
But of course, in the Good Ol' USA, the former chief
lobbyist for the wireless industry,
Thomas Wheeler
was recently appointed by
President Barack Obama
to head up the
Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), which regulates the safety
of wireless devices,
in yet another
astonishing conflict-of-interest in the
choice of appointed
Federal Regulators, who better
resemble wolves guarding the sheep,
rather than
advocates for the health of
the public at-large.
Video (about 10 mins):
No comments:
Post a Comment